Jury begins its deliberations in Sotheby's price-fixing trial
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A jury was sent out to start deliberating the biggest alleged scandal of the auction industry – deciding whether the former Sotheby's chairman hatched a multi-million dollar price-fixing scheme with a rival from Christie's.
Prosecutors have claimed that Alfred Taubman schemed with former Christie's chairman, Anthony Tennant, to steal as much as $400m (£280m) in commissions from sellers over a six-year period between 1993 and 1999. His defence has argued that he was set up by a power-hungry employee with questionable credibility.
During the often sensational trial, the court heard that the alleged scheme started after a meeting between the two men in London in 1993 at which they both agreed they were "killing each other on the bottom line and that it was time to do something about it".
Sotheby's profits started shrinking in the late 1980s, from $410m in 1989 to $202m in 1992. The prosecution's main witness was Diana Brooks, a former Sotheby's chief executive who pleaded guilty to price-fixing charges last year. She agreed to testify against Mr Taubman in hopes of avoiding a three-year prison sentence.
Ms Brooks said in her testimony that the two bosses ordered her and her Christie's counterpart to end a costly rivalry by eliminating discounts and charging identical, non-negotiable commissions.
Ms Brooks said Mr Taubman also warned her to keep quiet about it.
The secret deal denied sellers the opportunity to negotiate a lower commission from one auction house by threatening to take business to the other. Since some auction items are worth millions of dollars, negotiating even a slightly lower commission could translate into considerable savings for the seller.
The two auction houses control 90 per cent of the world's art auctions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments