Julius Jones lawyers file emergency motion seeking injunction to stop ‘torturous’ lethal injection
Motion cites Oklahoma’s ‘botched execution’ of John Grant, who witnesses say convulsed about two-dozen times
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lawyers for Julius Jones have filed an emergency motion in a federal court requesting an injunction to stay his execution today.
Attorneys argued the Eighth Amendment forbids the government from inflicting pain beyond that necessary to end a condemned prisoner’s life.
The motion cites the “botched execution” of John Grant, who witnesses say convulsed about two-dozen times and vomited following injection of midazolam.
The motion argues Mr Grant’s execution provides “compelling evidence that the Execution Protocol and the use of midazolam, as well as the cursory consciousness checks done under the Protocol, pose a serious and substantial risk of suffering and pain to prisoners”.
Defence lawyers cite that punishments are cruel when they involve “torture or a lingering death … something more than the mere extinguishment of life”.
A trial will be held on the constitutionality of Oklahoma’s execution protocol that is scheduled to begin in February 2022.
The motion requests an injunction to the execution of Mr Jones, scheduled at 4pm local time today, as well as other death row inmates, until after that trial is resolved.
“Some members of the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board expressed similar concerns about the execution of Mr Grant, and suggested that no executions take place until after the trial,” the motion notes.
Defence attorneys defended the late emergency motion in noting that the motion was filed on the day of Mr Jones’ scheduled execution.
“It is timely under circumstances where the Governor has not acted on the clemency recommendation that, if accepted, would not obviate the need for this motion being filed seeking emergency relief.”
Attorney Amanda Bass released a stamen earlier on Thursday slamming Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt for his silence on the parole board’s recommendation on clemency.
“The governor promised he would carefully consider everything presented to him and would issue a decision after meeting with Mr Jones’s lawyers and the victim’s family,” Ms Bass wrote.
“Our hope is that the Governor will ensure that this execution does not go forward given the many concerns about the execution process and Mr Jones’s case.”
The Independent and the nonprofit Responsible Business Initiative for Justice (RBIJ) have launched a joint campaign calling for an end to the death penalty in the US. The RBIJ has attracted more than 150 well-known signatories to their Business Leaders Declaration Against the Death Penalty - with The Independent as the latest on the list. We join high-profile executives like Ariana Huffington, Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg, and Virgin Group founder Sir Richard Branson as part of this initiative and are making a pledge to highlight the injustices of the death penalty in our coverage.