Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
A San Francisco judge has slashed the $137m in damages Tesla was told to pay a former employee in a racial discrimination case down to $15 million - but upheld the verdict.
In his ruling, US District Court Judge William Orrick said “the weight of the evidence amply supports the jury’s liability findings” but the damages ordered were “excessive,” citing constitutional limitations on punitive damages set by the Supreme Court.
Tesla was ordered in October to pay Black former employee Owen Diaz $137m in damages for turning a blind eye to racism the man encountered at the firm’s Silicon Valley auto plant.
Rejecting Tesla’s request for a retrial, Mr Orrick said “Tesla’s indifference to Diaz’s complaints is striking.”
He said the evidence presented to the jurors was “disturbing.”
“The jury heard that the Tesla factory was saturated with racism. Mr Diaz faced frequent racial abuse, including the N-word and other slurs,” the judge wrote.
He added: “His supervisors, and Tesla’s broader management structure, did little or nothing to respond.
“And supervisors even joined in on the abuse, one going so far as to threaten Mr Diaz and draw a racist caricature near his workstation.”
The original award comprised $130m in punitive damages and $6.9m for emotional distress, which Mr Orrick cut to $13.5m in punitive damages and $1.5m for emotional harm, “the maximum amount supportable by proof.”
Hired through a staffing agency, Mr Diaz had worked as an elevator operator between June 2015 and July 2016 at the Fremont plant, where he was subjected to racist abuse and a hostile work environment, according to the court filing.
In his lawsuit filed in 2017, Mr Diaz said African-American employees at the factory, where his son also worked, were regularly subjected to racist epithets and derogatory imagery.
Mr Diaz also said that, despite complaints to supervisors, Tesla took no action over the regular racist abuse.
Following the October verdict, Tesla released a blog post by human resources vice president Valerie Capers Workman, which downplayed the allegations of racist abuse in the lawsuit but acknowledged that at the time Mr Diaz worked there, Tesla “was not perfect.”
Ms Workman said Tesla had responded to Mr Diaz’s complaints, firing two contractors and suspending a third.
In February, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which enforces the state’s civil rights laws, sued Tesla over discrimination and harassment against Black workers at the same factory, which the complaint called a “racially segregated workplace.”
The agency said it had received hundreds of complaints from workers at the Fremont plant.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments