Judge horrified after female defendant was 'refused trousers and hygiene products'
‘No pants, what?’ the judge asked. 'This is outrageous.'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A woman who was brought to a Kentucky court without trousers and denied requests for hygiene products prompted a judge to take the case into her own hands.
According to WDRB, the woman was arrested for failing to complete a diversion program on a first-time shoplifting charge in 2014, and had been held for three days without trousers or the hygiene items.
She was sentenced to 75 days and was taken to the court room in Louisville on 29 July.
In the time-stamped video, her lawyer mentioned quietly that her client was not wearing trousers.
"No pants, what?" Judge Amber Wolf responded.
"Excuse me?" she said. "This is outrageous. Is this for real?"
She then phoned Metro corrections director Mark Bolton to ask why there was a female defendant in front of her who was not appropriately dressed.
The judge was also in disbelief over the sentence.
"It’s a shoplifting charge, a first time shoplifting charge," she said. "No. We’re not giving her that."
The judge apologised to the woman, saying she should have only been in custody for a day at the most, when the woman replied that there were other female prisoners in her situation.
Her lawyer added that some women were being denied showers.
Jail officials said the defendant had not been in custody long enough to receive a jump suit.
Mr Bolton also said there was an “abundance” of hygiene products in the women’s dorm.
"This is pretty standard that when individuals are arrested, they remain in the clothing that they’ve been arrested in," said spokesman Steve Durham. "Especially for the first 72 hours."
Mr Durham told the Courier Journal that no one had checked under the defendant’s long T-shirt to see she was wearing shorts.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments