Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge halts honeymoon murder trial

 

Jay Reeves,Ap
Friday 24 February 2012 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gabe Watson, who spent 18 months in an Australian prison for the death of his wife during a honeymoon diving trip, has been acquitted of her murder by a court in Birmingham, Alabama.

A judge halted the trial even before the defence had presented its case, saying prosecutors lacked evidence to prove Mr Watson, 34, intentionally killed his wife to claim a life insurance policy.

He had faced life in prison without parole if convicted.

Gabe and Tina Watson were diving on the Great Barrier Reef in 2003 when she drowned. Mr Watson pleaded guilty in Australia to manslaughter involving negligence.

The circuit judge Tommy Nail agreed with defence arguments that prosecutors failed to show Mr Watson intenionally drowned her for her insurance money. The only eyewitness testified that he believed Mr Watson was trying to save his wife.

The state's evidence was "sorely lacking" and did not prove Mr Watson had any financial motive. Jurors never got to deliberate.

"I don't think anyone knows for sure what happened in the water down there," said Mr Nail, who repeatedly clashed with prosecutors during both the trial and earlier hearings.

AP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in