Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Iran's letter to America cuts no ice in nuclear crisis

Rupert Cornwell
Tuesday 09 May 2006 19:05 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

European countries agreed last night to work on a new package of proposals including incentives for Iran, in an attempt to break a deadlock in the UN Security Council over the Iranian nuclear programme.

The move came after China and Russia blocked stern punitive action against Tehran. There was also deadlock between the US and Iran after the White House dismissed a letter from President Ahmedinejad to George Bush.

Speaking in Florida yesterday, Mr Bush did not even mention the missive from his Iranian counterpart - believed to be the first such communication between leaders of the two countries since they severed relations in the wake of the 1979 US embassy hostage crisis.

White House officials said the letter was no more than an extended lecture.

In it, Mr Ahmedinejad scolds the US for lying about the reasons for the Iraq war, for its support of Israel and even for supposedly keeping secret "various aspects" of the 2001 terrorist attacks. It chides Mr Bush for acting in an un-Christian manner, and points to the "ever increasing global hatred of the American government".

It does not directly address the nuclear issue, and the uranium enrichment programme that is at the heart of the West's fears that the Islamic regime is secretly pursuing nuclear weapons capability. The closest it comes is to complain that any technological and scientific achievement in the Middle East "is portrayed as a threat to the Zionist regime". The Iranian President asks "Was not scientific R&D a basic right of nations?" - a reiteration of Tehran's defiant stance.

As the text of the letter became known, the fault lines in the UN re-emerged when China and Russia made clear their opposition to a harsh Security Council resolution against Iran, which the US and its European allies had been hoping to secure this week.

Beijing and Moscow fear that the Chapter 7 resolution sought by Washington could open the way to sanctions against Iran and, ultimately, military action - just as the US claimed resolution 1441 from 2002 was the authority for the invasion of Iraq the following year.

The prospects for agreement this week "are not substantially good", a US official said after a dinner of the foreign ministers of Britain, France, the US, Russia, China and Germany. However, a meeting of senior officials of the five veto-holding Security Council powers in New York agreed last night that European diplomats would draw up proposals spelling out a choice of benefits or sanctions for Iran to comply with UN demands. The proposals will be presented to EU foreign ministers in Brussels next Monday.

Ali Larijani, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, insisted his country had no plans to pull out of the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty, committing signatories to pursue nuclear power exclusively for civil ends. He also said the proposal for Russia to enrich uranium on Iran's behalf - something Tehran had earlier seemed to reject - was still a possibility, "though time would be required".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in