Indiana school says it will continue to use ‘n-word’ in history lessons
The private school defends the use of the racial slur, saying it was included for ‘educational purposes’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Indiana school has defended one of its teachers using the “n-word” in a history lesson about slavery and the Civil War.
Some parents at Trinity Lutheran Church and School in Hobart, a outer suburb of Chicago, say they are unhappy that the racial slur was used, even in its historical context, in front of sixth and seventh-grade students.
“It was very inappropriate, disturbing, and upsetting,” a parent told NBC 5 News after the history teacher involved explained why the word had been used in an email to parents.
“I was also talking about why the idea of slavery was so important to plantation owners. I was telling them how the n-word was used as a surname like Mr or Mrs as used in Mark Twain’s Huck Finn,” the teacher said.
“I did use the word in class only to show the difference between Bob Smith the plantation owner verses Bob Smith the slave.”
Another parent told the news channel that the lesson could have been done without the use of the slur.
But the school has backed the teacher.
“In a recent history class, our school’s history teacher employed the use of a particular word within the context of a historical lesson,” the school said in a statement.
“It’s crucial to note that this choice was made solely for educational purposes, aimed at fostering a comprehensive understanding of the historical realities associated with the term.
“The school administration emphasizes that such language is and will continue to be strictly confined to historical teachings and does not endorse or tolerate its use in any other context, particularly when intended to demean or offend,” the statement continued.
“The incident underscores the importance of sensitive and responsible handling of historical materials in an educational setting, with a commitment to fostering an insightful and respectful learning environment.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments