New Hillary Clinton emails reveal links between State Department and Clinton Foundation donors
The emails, some of which were not handed to the FBI or congress, show that donors received special treatment and even had lobbying power for government job vacancies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.New emails released from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state have revealed a dubious relationship between donors of her charitable Clinton Foundation and the State Department.
Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained a total of 296 pages of emails via a Freedom of Information Request in 2015, 44 pages of which the group said were not handed over during the original Clinton email investigation.
The emails show that that donors to the foundation were treated by Ms Clinton’s aides as top priorities, even when it came to applying for government jobs.
The news comes shortly after the FBI and the US Department of Justice decided to not to prosecute the Democratic nominee for the misuse of her personal email server during her tenure as secretary of state. The Clinton Foundation was not part of that investigation or the 33,000 emails that the department combed through, despite the FBI’s request to include it.
In one email chain, Clinton Foundation official Doug Band tried to get Ms Clinton’s aides to accept his recommendation of a candidate for a job at the State Department.
He told aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin to “take care of” the person, whose name was redacted.
Ms Abedin replied: “Personnel has been sending him options.”
In another instance in 2009, Mr Band asked the two aides to help a Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire and donor called Gilbert Chagoury to get in contact with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon.
“As you know, he's a key guy there and to us and is loved in Lebanon. Very imp,” Mr Band wrote.
Ms Abedin responded: “It’s jeff feltman. I’m sure he knows him. I’ll talk to jeff.” She was referring to Jeffrey Feltman, the US ambassador at the time.
Judicial Watch president Tom Filton accused Ms Clinton of hiding 44 emails.
“No wonder Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin hid emails from the American people, the courts and Congress,” he said in a press release.
“They show the Clinton Foundation, Clinton donors, and operatives worked with Hillary Clinton in potential violation of the law.”
The Clinton campaign responded that the emails did not refer to Ms Clinton’s work at the foundation.
The Trump campaign has also used the most recent batch of emails as supposed proof that Ms Clinton is corrupt.
Mr Trump tweeted: “When is the media going to talk about Hillary’s policies that have gotten people killed, like Libya, open borders, and maybe her emails?”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments