Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Harvey Weinstein: Rose McGowan alleges ‘major conflict of interest’ over disgraced movie mogul's new legal team

Actress blasts legal team shakeup as disgraced film producer hires his accuser's former attorneys

Chris Riotta
New York
Friday 25 January 2019 12:18 EST
Comments
Harvey Weinstein arrives in court for hearing

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A judge has approved major changes to the legal team representing Harvey Weinstein in his rape and sexual assault case.

The judge’s approval allows the disgraced Hollywood mogul to swap out his bulldog New York City defence attorney for a four-person team that’s full of courtroom star power.

The film producer was in court in Manhattan — along with new lawyers Jose Baez, Ronald Sullivan and Duncan Levin, and former lawyer Benjamin Brafman — as Judge James Burke approved the switch.

“Welcome to the New York State Supreme Court,” Mr Burke told Weinstein’s new lawyers.

Weinstein and Mr Brafman announced last week they had “agreed to part ways amicably.”

The changes have arrived a month after they lost a hard-fought bid to get the case thrown out.

Weinstein’s trial is tentatively scheduled for May.

He is charged with raping a woman in 2013 and performing a forcible sex act on a different woman in 2006. He denies all allegations of nonconsensual sex.

Weinstein’s other new lawyer, Pamela Robillard Mackey, didn’t attend Friday’s hearing because she was out of the country.

Mr Baez is perhaps the best-known name of the four. He first gained fame for representing Casey Anthony, the Florida mom whose televised trial in 2011 ended in an acquittal on charges of killing her young daughter.

Actress Rose McGowan, one of the first of dozens of women to accuse Weinstein of sexual misconduct, blasted Mr Baez and Mr Sullivan for agreeing to represent Weinstein after they defended her in a drug case last year. She called it a “major conflict of interest.”

Video revealed of Harvey Weinstein behaving inappropirately with businesswoman Melissa Thompson in meeting from 2011, hours before he raped her

The two attorneys said in a statement that Ms McGowan’s case had nothing to do with Weinstein and that they were certain there was no conflict.

Ms McGowan, who pleaded no contest, has accused Weinstein of having someone plant the cocaine that Virginia authorities said they found in her wallet.

Asked while leaving the courtroom if he’s happy with his new legal team, Weinstein responded “absolutely.”

“I wish him the best of luck,” Mr Brafman said outside the courthouse.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for 8 March.

Additional reporting by AP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in