Harvard's quiz champions stripped of titles after cheating scandal
Student apologises for accessing question database
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Quizzers from the world-renowned Harvard University have been stripped of their US titles after it transpired that one of their former star men had accessed a website listing upcoming questions.
Officials from the National Academic Quiz Tournament (NAQT) said Andy Watkins, from the Massachusetts university's "A" team, viewed pages that listed the first 40 characters of forthcoming questions.
Mr Watkins, who graduated in 2011, had basic access to the tournament database because as well as being a competitor at college level, he wrote questions for a school-level tournament.
Now he and his former team-mates have been stripped of four titles, from 2009 to 2011, which have been awarded to the original runners-up.
Organisers said in a statement that though they had "neither direct nor statistical evidence" that his team had directly benefited from his snooping, "it goes against competitors' expectations of fair play."
Mr Watkins, who had gone on to work for the quiz tournament after graduating, admitted accessing the web pages in a statement, but siad: "I did compete in good faith".
He has resigned from NAQT.
He said: "I regret my breaches of question security.
"It will surprise no one that my mental health as an undergraduate was always on the wrong side of 'unstable', but that does not excuse my actions, nor does it ameliorate the damage done.
"I hold my team-mates from all three years to be champions today exactly as they were yesterday.
"I hope that they will consider themselves in the same light, even if my indiscretions mean that the record books cannot."
Michael Arnold, from the University of Chicago team that was retrospectively awarded the 2010 Division I championship after the scandal, said he was glad justice had been done, telling Insider Higher Education: "It's too bad that the other members of those Harvard teams have been hurt by Andy's actions, since they're good citizens within the quiz bowl community."
The tournament involves teams of four students, who compete to answer questions from across the "entire spectrum of a college curriculum" and "current events, sports, and popular culture" in a set time limit. Teams that win their regional championship qualify for the national Intercollegiate Championship Tournament.
The scandal was uncovered when one student from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology suddenly improved dramatically. After this, officials inspected the database's server logs.
They found that Watkins and students from three other universities had accessed the question pages. One championship title was stripped from each of the other three colleges.
NAQT said in its statement that it had launched a review of security following the discovery of cheating in previous years. Organisers have found "no signs of similar behaviour" in the approach to this year's tournament, it said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments