Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Incapacitated woman who gave birth at Arizona care facility was 'repeatedly violated and may have been pregnant before'

Family accuses state of being 'vicariously liable for negligence, gross negligence, and medical negligence'

Clark Mindock
New York
Thursday 23 May 2019 16:54 EDT
Comments
Nathan Sutherland pleads not guilty to sexual assault charge in February 2019 court appearance

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The family of the incapacitated woman who was raped and gave birth while in an Arizona long-term care facility last year claim she was pregnant at least once before in new court filings alleging “gross negligence”.

The new filings come as licensed practical nurse Nathan Sutherland, 36, has been charged with sexual assault and vulnerable adult abuse. He has pleaded not guilty.

But documents filed as a part of a settlement procedure with the state licensed facility, Hacienda Healthcare, and the state of Arizona say that the now-29-year-old woman was “violated repeatedly”, and was likely the victim of a “repeat parous event” — meaning, she was pregnant before, but it is unclear if she carried that child to term if she were.

According to those claims, the alleged repeated violations and potential previous pregnancy were discovered after the woman was taken in for an exam by the Maricopa County Medical Center in December, shortly after she gave birth.

The woman has been incapacitated since she was a child, but has a minimal ability to move some of her extremities and to make facial expressions.

The court filings indicate that the family had previously asked for more protection for the woman, including a requirement that only female staff be allowed to take care of her.

But, while Hacienda assured the family that was the plan, male staff were still allowed to care for the woman without the presence of others in the room, according to the new filings.

Attempts to contact the Arizona attorney general’s office and Hacienda Healthcare were not returned.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The family has accused the state of being “vicariously liable for the negligence, gross negligence, and medical negligence” of the young woman.

They also claim that there were at least 83 opportunities for healthcare workers at the facility to diagnose the woman’s pregnancy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in