Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Guantanamo degradation revealed

Rupert Cornwell
Thursday 14 July 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The investigation report, delivered to the Senate Armed Services Committee, found that techniques used at Guantanamo which had drawn complaints from FBI agents at the centre, did not constitute torture. And Major-General Geoffrey Miller, the commander of the prison in 2002 and 2003, who later went to Iraq to oversee detainee operations, escaped reprimand because his superiors ruled that prisoner interrogations during his tenure at Guantanamo did not breach US laws and regulations.

But the similarities between the treatment of at least one prisoner at Guantanamo Bay and what happened more than a year later in Iraq, proved "these techniques were not invented in the backwoods of West Virginia", said one human rights official here, referring to the low-ranking reservists who have borne the brunt of the punishment for Abu Ghraib.

The report said Mohamed al-Qahtani, a detainee accused of being the missing "20th hijacker" of 9/11, gave no information under standard interrogation, so his questioners forced him to stand naked in front of women, made him wear a bra and told him he was homosexual and that other prisoners knew it. They threatened him with dogs put a leash on him and forced him to act like a dog. Such techniques, and even more degrading variants, were used at Abu Ghraib prison.

The Pentagon officials said the methods, temporarily approved by the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, but later banned, were "creative" and "aggressive" but did not amount to torture. Some Republican senators questioned the need for the investigation, the latest of half a dozen into alleged abuse of detainees. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, said: "We've nothing to be ashamed of."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in