Governor of South Dakota signs abortion ban into law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The governor of South Dakota signed into law on Monday a ban on nearly all abortions in the state, setting up a court fight aimed at challenging the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalised abortion in the United States.
The new law makes it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless the procedure is necessary to save a woman's life and makes no exception for cases of rape or incest. Doctors could get up to five years in prison for performing an illegal abortion.
Planned Parenthood, which operates the state's only abortion clinic immediately pledged to challenge the measure. That challenge could either be in court or by collecting petition signatures to refer the measure to a statewide vote in which voters would be asked to repeal the abortion ban.
Governor Mike Rounds said he expected the law would be tied up in court for years and would not take effect unless the US Supreme Court upheld it. The ban is supposed to take effect on 1 July, but a federal judge is likely to suspend it during an expected legal challenge.
The South Dakota state legislature passed the bill last month after supporters argued that the recent appointment of two conservative justices, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, have made the Supreme Court more likely to overturn Roe vs Wade, the 1973 ruling that legalised abortion.
Mr Rounds earlier said he thought it would be better to eliminate abortion in steps rather than attempt a court challenge to wipe it out all at once. But he accepted that many abortion opponents would rather seek a reverse Roe vs Wade with a single Supreme Court ruling. AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments