George Floyd death leads states to require cops to intervene
When a police officer knelt on the neck of George Floyd in Minneapolis, other officers at the scene didn’t intervene, even while he said he couldn’t breathe and then stopped moving
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When a police officer knelt on the neck of George Floyd in Minneapolis other officers at the scene didn't intervene, even while Floyd said he couldn't breathe and stopped moving.
That lack of action is leading a growing number of states to compel police to stop misconduct by a fellow officer.
Since Floyd's death, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Nevada, and New Jersey have passed laws requiring police to intervene when they see a fellow officer engaged in misconduct, said Katie Ryan of Campaign Zero, a group which encourages reforms to reduce police violence.
Previously, many laws were aimed at compelling police to only report misconduct. But activists say Floyd's death makes clear that alone is not enough.
“The one essential component is that, in real time, a fellow officer has to intervene when witnessing another officer of any rank using excessive force,” Ryan said.
Oregon's Legislature also passed a bill in a special session last year requiring intervention by an officer witnessing police misconduct. It also requires officers to report abuses to “a supervisor.”
This year, lawmakers are tweaking the new law to strengthen how the complaints are handled. It is sponsored by Rep. Janelle Bynum, a Democrat who chairs the House subcommittee on equitable policing.
“For me, the original trigger was the George Floyd case,” said Bynum, who is Black and from a Portland suburb.
Portland was an epicenter of Black Lives Matter protests that erupted nationwide after Floyd's death. On the night of Sept. 5, a Black resident came to police officers to inform them their tear gas was seeping into his house, affecting his son and dog. One officer whacked the man on the head with his baton, causing a concussion.
Other officers told their colleague the man was an area homeowner, not a protester. Bynum says that shouldn't matter, that even if he was a protester, he shouldn't be attacked unprovoked.
“He wasn’t doing anything. And so I never got really clear answers from the city about why that was OK," Bynum said.
Police said back then that the incident was being investigated, but a half-year later they remain mum on the outcome or status.
“I have not been provided information to release about the incident,” Lt. Greg Pashley, a police spokesman, said in an email. “Generally, the Professional Standards Division does not provide updates about internal investigations.”
Bynum's new bill aims to address such cases. Under a proposed amendment, it requires complaints to be filed with a direct supervisor of the reporting officer, their chain of command or with the Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training, or DPSST, which licenses law enforcement officers across the state. The bill sets a three-month deadline for investigations to be completed.
Under the proposed amendment, if an investigation confirms misconduct occurred, the officer's unit must notify the DPSST, which would be tasked with establishing a database for reports of misconduct.
Rep. Ron Noble, a Republican who co-chairs Bynum’s subcommittee and previously served as a police officer for 28 years, said at a hearing that the additional steps over last year's bill are needed.
“This is a result of our experience in ensuring that what officers do report does get investigated and is followed up on,” Noble said.
Failure by an officers to intervene or report misconduct are grounds for disciplinary action. The employer may not retaliate against a reporting officer.
Maryland lawmakers are also working on legislation containing duty to intervene provisions. So is Washington state.
When the Washington state Senate passed such a bill in February, Republican senators opposed. Some said it should clarify that force being used by an officer should be excessive to an objective, reasonable observer, not just to the officer witnessing it. Democrats said that would cause an officer to think twice before intervening.
Sen. Manka Dhingra, the bill's sponsor, said good officers must be empowered to stop wrongdoing.
“They want to make sure they’re doing the right thing. This bill helps them do that,” Dhingra said.
___
Associated Press writers Gene Johnson in Seattle and Brian Witte in Annapolis, Maryland, contributed to this report.
___
Follow Andrew Selsky on Twitter at https://twitter.com/andrewselsky