US parents 'disappointed' after ruling they must complete chemotherapy for 3-year-old
Mother says case ‘opened up 'good discussion on parental rights, about patient rights’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge has told two Florida parents they must continue their three year old child’s chemotherapy - rather than seek exclusively alternative treatments.
Taylor Bland-Ball and Joshua McAdams’ three year old son has acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, a type of cancer of the blood and bone marrow.
The family was concerned about the side effects of chemotherapy, which include fatigue, hair loss, nausea, and appetite changes, on the young child, and thus expressed interest in alternative treatments including medical marijuana, alkaline dieting, and vitamin therapy.
The young boy reportedly received one session of chemotherapy at the Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital in St. Petersburg, Florida. After that session, his parents stopped appearing for their scheduled appointments.
The family was found in Kentucky after an endangered child search was put out in search of their young son. Ms Bland-Ball and Mr McAdams said they had only left Florida to find a second opinion in Ohio.
As a result of leaving the state and ceasing treatment, the couple’s son was removed from their custody and is currently living with his grandparents. Ms Bland-Ball and Mr McAdams are allowed supervised visitation during chemotherapy treatments, and are working on obtaining unsupervised visitation rights.
Judge Caroline Tesche Arkin said the family was welcome to use these alternative treatments, including medical marijuana which is legal in the state, in supplement to chemotherapy for their son, but the family must complete at least a 28 day course of chemotherapy as the primary treatment option.
After this first stage of treatment, the family is free to switch hospitals and receive a second opinion. The BBC reported that doctors at the hearing stressed that the toddler needed immediate chemotherapy to survive.
Ms Bland-Ball said that her husband and herself were "disappointed", but their case "really opened up a good discussion on parental rights, about patient rights".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments