Florida Supreme Court halts execution of man convicted of quadruple murder
Florida becomes latest state to delay an execution
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Florida Supreme Court on Tuesday halted the execution of a man convicted of killing four people while it waits on a ruling from the US Supreme Court on the legality of lethal injections, becoming the latest state to delay executions.
Jerry William Correll was convicted in 1986 of killing his daughter, his ex-wife, and his ex-wife’s mother and sister, the Orlando Sentinel reported. Correll was set to be killed on 26 February.
Correll’s attorneys filed an emergency petition to the state Supreme Court asking for a delay on the execution while the US high court decides whether lethal injections constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
The federal case centres on an issue brought by three inmates in Oklahoma who argue that the first drug in the three-drug cocktail used in lethal injections violates inmate’s Eighth Amendment rights.
That drug, midazolam, is administered as a sedative, but opponents of the drug say it’s not powerful enough to prevent pain brought on by the two other drugs that are given.
“Because the lethal injection protocol under review in the Supreme Court is virtually identical to the Florida three-drug lethal injection protocol, a stay of execution in this case is appropriate,” wrote Chief Justice Jorge Labarga in the majority opinion. “... Without the stay of execution in this case, Florida risks the unconstitutional execution of Correll, for which there is no remedy.”
Executions in the US have come under fire since Oklahoma botched the execution of Clayton Lockett last year. Lockett was alive for 43 minutes after his lethal injection was administered, often writing in pain. An investigation found the problem was in the placement of the IV, not in the drugs used.
Still, the status of the death penalty in the US is in question. Earlier this year, the US Supreme Court opted to delay the executions of the three Oklahoma inmates who brought the case questioning the lethal injection and, last week, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf placed a moratorium on executions in the state pending the results of a study on the issue.
The lethal injection case puts the Supreme Court is in a position to rule on the constitutionality of such executions. On two previous occasions it has ruled in favour of the injections. Still, the possibility of a ruling that would ban lethal injections has prompted Wyoming to consider the use of a firing squad as an alternative form of execution.
The Supreme Court likely will take up the lethal injection case at some point this summer.
Follow Payton Guion on Twitter @PaytonGuion.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments