Florida high school teacher uses signal jammer to stop pupils using cell phones
Dean Liptak said he wanted youngsters to concentrate on their lessons, not their devices
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In his own words, Florida teacher Den Liptak simply wanted to do something to stop his pupils constantly being distracted by their cell phones.
His solution was perhaps a little severe.
This week it emerged that Mr Liptak had been suspended without pay for five days after officials were told the teacher had bought a signal jammer and used it to render his pupils’ devices useless.
Mr Liptak, who teaches science at Fivay High School, believed his actions were benefiting the youngsters as they would be better able to concentrate on the lessons he was teaching.
“I wanted to fix the cell phone problem in my class,” he told an investigator.
But according to a report in the Tampa Bay Times, the school authorities were not impressed.
“Not only did your actions potentially violate federal law, you posed a serious risk to critical safety communications as well as the possibility of preventing others from making 9-1-1 calls,” superintendent Kurt Browning wrote in a letter informing Liptak of his suspension,
The disciplinary action also came with a reprimand and a last chance agreement. Any future similar poor judgment could result in a recommendation of termination, Mr Browning wrote.
Mr Liptak previously received a letter of warning in 2013 over using a worksheet that included “inappropriate content”. Mr Liptak did not contest the suspension.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments