Ferguson sued by Justice Department over changes to police reform agreement
Ferguson, Missouri officials demanded changes to an agreement reached with the Justice Department on police reforms.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The United States Department of Justice has sued Ferguson, Missouri after city officials reneged on an agreement to reform its troubled police department.
The Justice Department spent months negotiating a deal with Ferguson officials, but two weeks after reaching a tentative agreement on police reforms, city officials demanded changes be made to that agreement.
All six members of the Ferguson City Council on Tuesday voted to accept the reform deal, but only on the condition that certain changes be made, the Washington Post reported. Those changes include not requiring pay increases for officers, and changes to deadlines and some fees.
The Justice Department expressed annoyance at the Ferguson officials after Tuesday's vote. On Wednesday, they filed suit.
"The Ferguson City Council has attempted to unilaterally amend the negotiated agreement," Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, of the department's Civil Rights Division, said in a statement. "Their vote to do so creates an unnecessary delay in the essential work to bring constitutional policing to the city, and marks an unfortunate outcome for concerned community members and Ferguson police officers."
Ferguson has faced intense scrutiny since a white police officer shot unarmed black teenager Michael Brown in the summer of 2014. Subsequent investigations found systematic discrimination and bias in the city, which has a long history of racial tensions. A grand jury did not charge the officer, Darren Wilson, in Mr. Brown's death, re-igniting protests that began after the shooting.
The deal between Ferguson and the Justice Department is meant to improve relations between police and the community, and ensure that officers are properly trained and supervised, among other things. City officials claim they voted on the changes after residents came forward with concerns about the deal, the Post reported.
Ferguson officials have acknowledged fighting the Justice Department lawsuit will be costly, probably running up a tab in the millions of dollars, but Mayor James Knowles III said challenging the suit will be cheaper than implementing costly parts of the agreement, according to the New York Times.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch slammed Ferguson lawmakers on Wednesday.
"The city of Ferguson had a real opportunity here to step forward, and instead they've turned backwards," Ms. Lynch said, according to the Times. "They've chosen to live in the past."
Follow @PaytonGuion on Twitter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments