FBI questions Bush officials over 'outing' of CIA agent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FBI agents this weekend began questioning Bush administration officials about the illegal outing of a Central Intelligence Agency officer, as it emerged that a CIA front company she worked for had also been blown, possibly endangering other agency personnel and contacts.
Amid the biggest political scandal to hit the White House since the current President took office, the FBI has written to the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon, ordering senior managers to ensure that any potential evidence relating to the leaking of the CIA operative's name be preserved. At the same time, the Attorney General, John Ashcroft, is coming under increased pressure to appoint an independent investigator to head the inquiry.
The FBI's investigation is intended to find the person who identified the wife of a former US ambassador as a CIA operative to the right-wing syndicated newspaper columnist Robert Novak. Mr Novak wrote that Joseph Wilson - who travelled to Africa to check and ultimately disprove a claim that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium from Niger - had been dispatched at the suggestion of his wife, Valerie Plame. He said his sources were "two administration officials".
Democrats have been in full battle cry, demanding a criminal investigation into the matter, especially after Mr Wilson suggested that President Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, had orchestrated the leak in an effort to discredit him.
It was also revealed that anonymous White House officials had contacted at least five other journalists in order to "out" Ms Plame. Only Mr Novak, a veteran Republican, chose to do so. Since then the name of her ostensible employer has also become public, forcing officials to admit it was a CIA front company.
With its mix of politics, the war against Iraq, espionage and lies, "Leakgate" has many of the trappings of a classic Washington scandal. But the involvement of Mr Wilson, a former surfer and self-confessed "beach bum", and his wife has added a human dimension to a story that, in this city at least, has largely been characterised by claims about weapons of mass destruction.
"I have always said that the desire to implicate my wife in this was intended to intimidate others from coming forward," said Mr Wilson. "The idea that someone would do this is an anathema to me and should be an anathema to a president who came to office promising to restore honour to the White House."
Mr Wilson, a former US ambassador, has been in the sights of the White House ever since the summer when he revealed that, after travelling to Niger at the request of the CIA, he had concluded that Iraq had not been seeking to buy uranium. His comments forced the White House to admit that "16 words" included in the President's State of the Union speech making such a link had been wrong.
Speaking exclusively to The Independent on Sunday and then later in an op-ed piece he wrote for The New York Times, Mr Wilson said: "I had been asked to look into whether it was feasible that Niger had entered into an agreement to sell uranium to Iraq. My report was very unequivocal."
The issue has the potential to do real damage to the Bush administration, given how easy it has been for the Democrats to attack what has been seen as a politically motivated attack on a career CIA operative. There is also a criminal element to the matter: identifying an under-cover agent is a federal crime that carries penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a fine of $50,000.
Yet even under real pressure the Bush administration continues to seek to rubbish Mr Wilson - former acting ambassador to Iraq and the last US official to meet Saddam Hussein - by portraying him as a partisan Democrat, despite sizeable financial contributions he and his wife also made to the Bush-Cheney campaign. "It's slime and defend," one Republican aide on Capitol Hill told The New York Times.
Neighbours who live near Mr Wilson and his wife in Washington - until now unaware of Ms Plame's real job - have portrayed them as "perfect neighbours".
"With the exception perhaps of Colin Powell, both of them have put their lives at more risk than anyone in the Bush administration," said David Tillotson, a lawyer who - with his wife - has been a regular dinner guest at the Wilson house over the past six years.
"It's incredible. These are the people the government should be defending, because they are risking their personal safety."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments