Enron outrage tilts Congress towards ban on 'soft money' election funding
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Congress, spurred by national outrage over the Enron scandal, is close this week to approving the first big reform of campaign finance since the 1974 Watergate crisis.
The House of Representatives is due to vote tomorrow on a bill that would ban so-called soft money – massive unregulated contributions from corporations, unions and individuals to the parties, which "launder" them into finance for specific campaigns.
A similar bill has passed the Senate, and backers of the House measure believe that the debacle of Enron, which, in a decade, gave some $6.5m (£4.5m) of "soft money" in return for political access, has made the system indefensible.
The House bill, sponsored by Martin Meehan, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Christopher Shays, a Connecticut Republican, has only come to the floor because a majority of the 435 congressmen signed a petition demanding a vote, in defiance of the wishes of the House Republican leadership. No less a figure than the Speaker, Dennis Hastert, has said passage of the bill would be an "armageddon" for the Republicans and would cost his party control of the House.
Six months ago, such a threat might have been enough. But Enron has created momentum for the measure and made a veto by President George Bush next to impossible. In the 2000 campaign, when Republicans and Democrats collected $458m of "soft money", Mr Bush strongly opposed curbs. But the last thing he wants to do now is attract further attention to the close links between his administration and Enron.
The vote on the bill will come 24 hours after Kenneth Lay, Enron's former chairman and a personal friend of Mr Bush, appears at a Senate hearing. He is likely to refuse to testify.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments