Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ellen Pao: Discrimination defeat, but venture capital partner hopes case will help women

She had sued Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Bryers claiming she had been pressured out of the company

Jamie Campbell
Saturday 28 March 2015 13:08 EDT
Comments
Ellen Pao’s discrimination suit may have emboldened other female employees in Silicon Valley (Reuters)
Ellen Pao’s discrimination suit may have emboldened other female employees in Silicon Valley (Reuters) (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Following the loss of her $16m gender discrimination lawsuit against the venture capital-firm Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Bryers, former partner of the firm Ellen Pao took to twitter express her feelings following the case.

She inserted a coded message into the tweets suggesting that she certainly doesn’t feel as though she has been dealt with in a just manner.

Pao, now interim chief of social site Reddit, claimed that she suffered six years of discrimination at the company after she complained about a colleague, Ajit Nazaire, who had allegedly pressured her into a brief affair which she soon broke off.

She is thought to have intentionally left out the number 8 as a reference to California's Proposition 8. This was a 2008 act that banned gay marriage and was possibly used by Pao to evoke the extent of how strong Pao felt the discrimination was.

Other twitter users were quick to react to the news of the case:

"This case sends a powerful signal to Silicon Valley in general and the venture capital industry in particular," she said, "Defendants who lose in court sometimes win outside of it."

In a brief news conference after leaving the courtroom, Pao said: "If I've helped to level the playing field for women and minorities in venture capital, then the battle was worth it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in