Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Grubhub, Uber Eats and DoorDash suing New York City over fee limits designed to protect restaurants during pandemic

Companies claim they have lost ‘hundreds of millions of dollars’ due to fee caps

Graig Graziosi
Friday 10 September 2021 15:19 EDT
Comments
Jim Cramer: Restaurants Need DoorDash, Uber Eats and Grubhub

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Uber Eats, Grubhub and DoorDash - the nation's largest food delivery services - are suing New York City over a limit it put on fees the companies could charge in an effort to shield restaurants struggling to survive during the pandemic.

The lawsuit was filed on Thursday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, and claims the fees represent government overreach. The companies said in the suit that they were "instrumental in keeping restaurants afloat and food industry workers employed" and that they invested millions of dollars to support the industry during the pandemic.

The companies hope to secure a jury trial and an injunction preventing New York City from extending a fee cap that was put in place in August, as well as unspecified monetary damages.

In May 2020, the city first enacted price caps on third-party delivery services. The cap prevents the services from charging restaurants more than 15 per cent of an online order in fees and 5 per cent for any other services, including marketing.

In August, the city passed several bills aimed at helping smaller restaurants. Included in those bills were prohibitions on some service charges and mandates requiring restaurant phone number to be posted on the services, according to The Associated Press.

The city also extended the fee caps until at least early next year.

New York Law Department spokesman, Nicholas Paolucci, told the AP that the extensions were legal and that the city intends to defend them in court.

The lawsuit claims that the city is continually pushing back the expiration date of its price caps, essentially making them permanent. The complaint claims that the extensions have cost them "hundreds of millions of dollars”.

"The ordinance is unconstitutional because, among other things, it interferes with freely negotiated contracts between platforms and restaurants by changing and dictating the economic terms on which a dynamic industry operates," the lawsuit states.

On Friday, DoorDash issued a statement regarding the lawsuit, saying: "Price controls can lead to higher prices for consumers, which can reduce orders and earnings for Dashers. Imposing permanent price controls in an unprecedented and dangerous overreach by the government and will limit the options small businesses rely on to compete in an increasingly competitive market."

The food delivery services have been sparring with local governments across the nation over similar restrictions.

Chicago accused DoorDash and Grubhub of hurting city restaurants and customers by charging high fees and using "deceptive" practices. The companies said Chicago's allegations were "baseless".

The companies are also embroiled in a battle in California, particularly in San Francisco. The city accused the companies of violating state law by not classifying drivers as employees. In Washington DC, DoorDash settled with the city in 2019 over allegations it misled customers regarding the amount drivers made in tips.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in