Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

White House releases sensitive personal information of voters worried about their sensitive personal information

The Trump White House and its Election Integrity Commission were criticised for asking voters for personal information, including addresses, partial social security numbers, and party affiliation.

Christopher Ingraham
Saturday 15 July 2017 07:54 EDT
Comments
The White House released a number of angry emails from voters concerned about the security of their personal information
The White House released a number of angry emails from voters concerned about the security of their personal information (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Trump White House on Thursday made public a trove of emails it received from voters offering comment on its Election Integrity Commission.

The commission drew widespread criticism when it emerged into public view by asking for personal information, including addresses, partial social security numbers, and party affiliation, on every voter in the country.

It further outraged voters by planning to post that information publicly.

Voters directed that outrage toward the Trump White House and the voter commission, often using profanity-laced language in the emails released this week, 112 pages of them.

"You will open up the entire voting population to a massive amount of fraud if this data is in any way released," wrote one voter.

"Many people will get their identity stolen, which will harm the economy," wrote another.

"I respectfully request, as an American-born citizen legally eligible to vote for two decades, that you leave my voter data and history alone, do not publish it, and do nothing with it," said another.

Unfortunately for these voters and others who wrote in, the Trump administration did not redact any of their personal information from the emails before releasing them to the public. In some cases, the emails contain not only names, but email addresses, home addresses, phone numbers and places of employment of people worried about such information being made available to the public.

The Washington Post is not publishing any of this information, because it does not appear that the individuals were aware their comments would be shared by the White House. The emails were sent to the address that the administration asked Secretaries of State to send data files to.

"This request is very concerning," wrote one. "The federal government is attempting to get the name, address, birth date, political party, and social security number of every voter in the country." That email, published by the White House, contained the sender's name and home address.

"DO NOT RELEASE ANY OF MY VOTER DATA PERIOD," wrote one voter whose name and email address was published by the White House.

"Beefed up the security on this email address yet?" asked another voter whose name and email address were also published by the White House.

"The request for private voter information is offensive," wrote one voter whose name, home address and email address were published by the White House.

"I removed my name from voter rolls. And I'm a Republican!" wrote one voter whose name was published by the White House.

Federal agencies often solicit and release public comments on proposed legislation. Regulations.gov, the federal government's clearing house for public comments, includes a detailed set of guidelines explaining how to submit comments, what type of personal information is collected, and how that information may be used.

"Some agencies may require that you include personal information, such as your name and email address, on the comment form," the website explains. The Securities and Exchange Commission, for instance warns commenters to "submit only information that you wish to make available publicly."

Similarly, the FTC tells commenters that "published comments include the commenter's last name and state/country as well as the entire text of the comment. Please do not include any sensitive or confidential information."

The White House does not appear to have issued any such public guidelines or warnings prior to releasing the emails, all of which appear to have been sent to the Election Integrity Commissions' email address as listed in a letter sent to U.S. Secretaries of State.

A spokesman for Vice President Mike Pence who previously responded to inquires about the voter commission did not immediately return a request for comment.

While the letter invited secretaries of state to send comments and voter data via that email address, the White House now says that "any member of the public wishing to submit written comments for the Commission's consideration may do so via email" at that address, ElectionIntegrityStaff@ovp.eop.gov. It warns that "the Commission may post such written comments publicly on our website, including names and contact information that are submitted."

The page that warning is contained on was published on 13 July. The emails published by the White House were written between 29 June and 11 July.

Copyright Washington Post

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in