Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge orders Trump to sit for seven-hour deposition despite lawyers claiming he was 'too important'

The President-elect's legal team argued that he would be 'extremely busy handling matters of very significant public importance'

Charlotte England
Thursday 15 December 2016 07:53 EST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump will have to give up to seven-hours of evidence in a lawsuit he filed against celebrity chef José Andrés before he takes presidential office, a judge has ruled.

Attorneys for the US President-elect attempted to argue he was too important to be subjected to a normal amount of questioning. But Judge Jennifer A. Di Toro refused to make a dispensation for the future head of state at the Superior Court in Washington DC.

He will now be required to sit through the same length deposition as anybody else, in New York's Trump Tower in early January.

Mr Trump's witness statement is required as part of an ongoing contractual dispute with Mr Andrés.

He is attempting to sue the restaurateur for breach of contract, after Mr Andrés backed out of a plan to open a restaurant in Mr Trump's new luxury hotel in Washington. The chef claims he cancelled the project because of comments Mr Trump made about Mexicans during the presidential campaign.

Mr Trump's attorneys had previously agreed to the deposition, but sought to limit the length and scope of questioning, arguing in court filings: “Mr Trump is not just any apex deponent; he is the President-elect ... It is not an overstatement that he is extremely busy handling matters of very significant public importance.”

Judge Ms Di Toro said limiting Mr Trump's examination would limit the defence team's ability to prepare their case for trial, because “Mr Trump's own statements are at the heart [of the case]".

Mr Andrés has previously suggested the parties bring their lawsuit to an end and instead donate money to a veterans organisation.

Mr Trump and his businesses have been involved in at least 3,500 legal actions over the past three decades.

A group of lawyers in the US recently decided not publish a report on the President-elects strategic use of litigation, which they described as "baseless", because they were afraid he would launch baseless litigation against them.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in