House report finds lax federal oversight of Trump's DC hotel
A congressional report says the federal agency overseeing the lease of the luxury hotel that Donald Trump’s family company runs in the nation’s capital failed to carry out its basic responsibilities
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The federal agency overseeing the lease of the luxury hotel that Donald Trump s family company runs in the nation's capital failed to carry out its basic responsibilities because it never tracked the millions of dollars from foreign governments patronizing the hotel or examined the origins of a $75 million loan that helped keep its doors open, according to a congressional report Thursday.
The General Services Administration "washed its hands of responsibility” to review how much the Trump International Hotel was profiting during his presidency from foreign government payments in possible violation of the Constitution's emoluments clause, according to the report by the Democratic-led House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. That provision bars presidents from receiving gifts or payments from foreign governments.
The committee said the GSA “ignored critical ethical and constitutional issues involving then-President Trump’s financial interest in the hotel.”
Neither the agency nor the Trump Organization responded to requests for comment.
In 2019, the agency's internal watchdog had criticized the GSA for failing in crucial oversight of the property.
The committee chairman, Rep. Peter DeFazio, also said the GSA failed to examine who had loaned the hotel $75 million, a possible source of conflict between Trump's private financial interests and his public role as president. It was later disclosed that the loan came from the Trump family.
A separate report by the House Oversight and Reform Committee in October said Trump had misled the public on the hotel's finances. The committee released financial statements showing the hotel had lost more than $70 million while he was president.
Ethics lawyers who have criticized Trump's decision to not divest himself of the Washington hotel and other financial interests before becoming president in January 2017 have repeatedly faulted the GSA for not canceling the family's hotel lease despite language in the contract barring government officials from profiting from the property. The hotel occupies the government-owned Old Post Office building. A federal lease with the Trump family runs nearly 100 years, with extensions.
The GSA has said that its review showed Trump was in “full compliance” of the lease because profits from the hotel were not going directly to Trump while he was president. Trump put his assets in a trust controlled by his two adults sons and a longtime executive before his term began.
Separately, the GSA confirmed this week that the Trump Organization had given formal notice that it had reached agreement to sell the hotel lease for $375 million to CGI Merchant Group, a Miami-based real estate investment firm. The GSA needs to sign off on any purchase.