Donald Trump firing Attorney General Sally Yates has led to breakdown of rule of law, say legal experts
The sacking of attorney general Sally Yates violates 'a principle that everything else in our democracy depends on', said Matthew Miller
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The rule of law is undergoing a "major breakdown", according to a former member of staff at the Department of Justice.
Donald Trump's decision to fire attorney general Sally Yates – who was forced out after questioning whether the controversial Muslim ban is legal, and refusing to defend it in court – violates a "principle that everything else in our democracy depends on", according to Matthew Miller. Mr Miller served as director of public affairs at the US DoJ, and echoed the opinions of a range of commentators in criticising the decision to sack Ms Yates.
"In our democracy, the president is not supposed to dictate to the [attorney general] how to interpret the law," he wrote on Twitter. "This is a major breakdown in the rule of law.
"A president who fires an AG over this will think he can fire an AG over, say, a probe into whether his campaign coordinated [with] Russia."
He criticised the decision to replace Ms Yates with Dana Boente, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, who was sworn in at a private ceremony and immediately. He is thought to be much less opposed to Mr Trump than Ms Yates, who had served under President Obama.
“I am honoured to serve President Trump in this role," Mr Boente said when he was appointed. "I will defend and enforce the laws of our country to ensure that our people and our nation are protected."
Mr Boente pondered whether the Trump administration had chosen Mr Boente precisely because he would follow orders.
"The next US [attorney] in line of succession was not Boente, but Zach Fardon," he wrote. "Did Trump go forum shopping for one who would follow orders?"
He said that people should oppose the move no matter how they feel about the Executive Order that banned refugees and people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US.
"No matter what you think about the EO, the independence of DOJ is a principle that everything else in our democracy depends on," he wrote.
Lawyer and constitutional expert David Allen green echoed the comments, hailing Sally Yates as a hero.
"Far from "betraying" the @theJusticeDept, Sally Yates chose not to betray the Rule of Law," he wrote on Twitter, in reference to comments in the press release from Donald Trump. "A legal hero."
A follow-up post read: "Something is wrong when language of "treachery" and "betrayal" is used when sacking those upholding the US constitution and the Rule of Law".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments