Democrat Adam Schiff wants to meet author of Trump-Russia dossier Christopher Steele
California Representative willing to sit down with ex-British intelligence agent outside of House Intelligence Committee hearings to discuss findings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee wants to speak with the British author of an unsubstantiated report alleging the Russian government had compromising material on President Trump.
Representative Adam Schiff told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Tuesday that he was “more than willing” to meet author Christopher Steele “in any manner that he is comfortable,” even if it meant connecting with him on his own turf instead of in the House Intelligence Committee’s hearing room.
Schiff added that “other members of the committee would join me in that.”
His entreaty to Steele comes just one day after Schiff and committee Chairman Devin Nunes (Republican-California) announced they would hold an open hearing on March 20 - the first of their investigation into Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 elections.
The panel chiefs invited the FBI director, the director of national intelligence, and the former heads of the CIA and the Department of Justice to testify at the hearing. Nunes added that he would welcome the testimony of anyone else with information pertinent to the investigation, and would be willing to accommodate a closed-door forum for those with concerns about the sensitivity of the information they planned to disclose.
Steele could potentially fall into that category - though Nunes did not mention him specifically.
The former MI6 officer reemerged Tuesday after several weeks in apparent hiding. He eschewed the opportunity to comment on the firestorm set off by BuzzFeed’s publication of his secret, unsubstantiated report alleging Trump’s ties to Moscow range from financial entanglements to salacious trysts.
The report initially gained notoriety after intelligence community officials elected to brief then-president elect Trump on a summary of its contents, delivered alongside an official assessment that alleged Russian authorities masterminded a series of cyber hacks and disclosures of hacked information in an attempt to steer the presidential election in Trump’s favour.
Not everyone on Capitol Hill believes that assessment - or other accusations that Trump team members colluded with Kremlin authorities to advance the president’s candidacy - is entirely accurate.
“I don’t believe that to be the case,” Nunes said this week, when asked if he believed there was any coordination between the Trump team and Moscow. “I don’t think the evidence exists for that.”
Nunes noted that the investigation was in its early stages - a warning being repeated by leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee as they dig in on a similar probe.
“The American people deserve to hear all of the facts,” Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner (Democrat-Virginia) said Wednesday, having recently returned from a visit to CIA headquarters at Langley where he said he and a small group of other senators combed through a “first round of documents” in “big, big binders” pertaining to the investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the election.
The Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments