Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Stricter Covid restrictions meant virus spread was 8% lower in Democrat than GOP-run states, study finds

Authors argue decisions on public health measures should be left to health professionals not politicians

Oliver O'Connell
New York
Monday 11 October 2021 17:52 EDT
Comments
Related Video: Bay Area health officers to announce plans to eventually lift mask mandates

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

States with stricter restrictions to combat the Covid-19 pandemic led by Democratic governors had a lower spread of the virus than Republican-led states, according to new research.

The study, published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, underscores how preventative restrictions have been “politicised” and that it is health professionals who should be calling the shots.

Researchers from Binghamton University calculated a Public Health Policy Index (PPI) to determine how stringent a state’s public health policies were, and analysed those findings against the state’s transmission of Covid-19 and the governor’s political affiliation.

The peer-reviewed study looked at the period between March and November 2020 taking into account when a state’s number of Covid cases peaked.

States with Democratic governors had a PPI that was 10 points higher on average than states with Republican governors.

The study notes there were some exceptions to the rule, for example, Maryland, Vermont, and Massachusetts have Republican governors but had measures in place closer to those employed by Democratic states.

On average, the 10-point difference in PPI led to an eight per cent increase in the expected number of cases.

As an example, New York, hit hard by Covid at the start of the pandemic, would have seen a higher and later peak in May rather than April, had strict restrictions not been put in place.

The authors argue that decisions regarding public health measures should be left to health professionals over politicians.

“The main lesson of this research is that better public health requires a less partisan approach to the making of public health policies,” says a statement by study co-author Olga Shvetsova, a political science professor at Binghamton University, State University of New York.

This is not the first study to draw conclusions about the efficacy of stay-at-home orders, mask mandates, and other state-imposed restrictions.

An earlier study that appeared in the same journal also linked Republican states’ looser restrictions with higher Covid-19 cases than Democratic states.

Republican governors were the first to lift any restrictions they had in place and have taken steps to ban local jurisdictions and schools from imposing new ones.

These same states, notably in the south, have also seen the lowest uptake of coronavirus vaccines leading to a surge in case numbers when the more infectious Delta variant of the virus arrived in the US.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in