Man pleads guilty to cocaine possession after being caught with powdered milk so he could move from county jail

Cody Gregg was cruising through an industrial neighbourhood southwest of downtown Oklahoma City on 12 August when police spotted him.

It was around 10.30pm when the officers noticed that the shirtless, backpack-clad homeless man did not have any rear lights on his bicycle, according to a probable cause affidavit obtained by The Oklahoman.

They tried to stop him but he only pedalled harder, ditching the bike after about three blocks and running away on foot.

When they finally caught up to Mr Gregg and demanded to search his backpack, they found a large clear plastic bag of white powder stuffed in a coffee can. Police concluded that the substance was cocaine and charged the man with a felony.

Last week, after spending nearly two months in jail, he pleaded guilty to cocaine possession with the intent to distribute and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

But on Thursday, just two days after learning his fate, Mr Gregg was back in court again, this time to withdraw his guilty plea.

The lab tests had come back, and they showed that the suspicious-looking white substance was actually powdered milk, The Oklahoman said.

He told the judge that he got the milk from a food pantry. He said that he entered a guilty plea only so that he could stop languishing in the Oklahoma County Jail, which has been plagued with issues ranging from overcrowding to chronic mould and an unusually high suicide rate for decades.

On Friday, the case was dismissed and Mr Gregg was released.

The Oklahoma City Police Department could not immediately be reached on Tuesday night to clarify how powdered milk was mistaken for a stash of illegal drugs.

In the probable cause affidavit, an officer wrote that the baggie contained “a large amount of white powder substance that I believed to be cocaine based on my training and experience”, and that the powder “later tested positive for cocaine and was a total package weight of 45.91 grams of cocaine”.

It is not the first time that a harmless household staple has been incorrectly categorised as an illicit drug.

In 2016, The New York Times magazine and ProPublica revealed that tens of thousands of people nationwide were being jailed each year based on the results of finicky roadside drug tests that frequently produced false positives.

Often, the tests were responding by environmental factors like the weather or the presence of chemicals found in household cleaners.

In some instances, police simply did not understand how to use them correctly

As The Washington Post wrote last year, the list of innocent items that have been misidentified as dangerous drugs includes chocolate chip cookies, breath mints and the glaze from a Krispy Kreme doughnut.

Despite growing awareness that the tests have a high error rate – some studies have found that they result in false positives a fifth or even a third of the time – many police departments continue to rely on them.

At the time of his 12 August arrest, Mr Gregg was on probation. Court records show he had been arrested on drug-related charges at least three times since 2014 and had previously pleaded guilty to possessing marijuana, methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. In at least one instance, the costs of his incarceration were waived due to mental illness.

After cops found the sketchy-looking but ultimately innocent white powder, Mr Gregg was charged with trafficking illegal drugs and jailed on a $50,000 (£39,000) bond.

He initially pleaded not guilty, but after nearly two months in jail, he changed his mind. On 8 October he pleaded guilty to a lesser charge: possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute.

That same day, Mr Gregg was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Though he was released just days later when his public defender pointed out the new evidence that had emerged, showing that the white powder tested negative for cocaine, many on social media argued that Mr Gregg’s ordeal illustrated a larger problem with the criminal justice system.

Rather than spend months or even years in jail while awaiting a trial, people who cannot afford to pay bail often end up reluctantly pleading guilty to crimes they did not commit.

The National Registry of Exonerations has found that 66 per cent of people who were exonerated after being convicted of drug crimes ended up in prison in the first place because they entered a guilty plea.

Similarly, the 2016 New York Times-ProPublica investigation found that more than half of the people charged with drug crimes on the basis of a faulty field test pleaded guilty at the first opportunity.

“Innocent people plea[d] guilty. A lot,” tweeted Jason Lollman, a public defender in Tulsa, who added that the Oklahoma County Jail is “widely considered one of the worst in the country”.

“Any innocent person would consider pleading guilty just to get out,” he wrote.

The Washington Post