CIA 'torture report' in full: Read the Senate Intelligence Committee's damning findings
Techniques used by the CIA included threatening to sexually assault a detainees' mother, intense sleep deprivation, and water-boarding
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The CIA’s secret programme of abductions and “brutal” interrogations of terrorism suspects was ineffective and saw dozens of people subjected to torture without purpose, a damning report has revealed.
The declassified report shows how at the height of George W Bush’s war on terror, the CIA misled the public about the effectiveness of the programme, which ran from 2002 to 2006.
Compiled by Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee, the report also says the CIA failed secure information that would stop terror attacks like those on the World Trade Centre. Its publication today has triggered the stepping up of security at US facilities around the world, with officials concerned about potential retaliatory attacks.
“This document examines the CIA's secret overseas detention of at least 119 individuals and the use of coercive interrogation techniques - in some cases amounting to torture,” Senate committee chair Dianne Feinstein said.
The CIA said its interrogations – which included subjecting prisoners to waterboarding and sleep deprivation – saved lives. But it admits “mistakes” were made.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments