Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

California becomes first state to require women on corporate boards

Senator who authored bill thinks having more women in positions of power could decrease sexual assault and harassment in workplaces

Maya Oppenheim
Women's Correspondent
Monday 01 October 2018 08:32 EDT
Comments
A fourth of publicly held corporations with headquarters in California do not have any women on their boards of directors
A fourth of publicly held corporations with headquarters in California do not have any women on their boards of directors (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

California has become the first state in the US to require publicly traded companies to include women on their board of directors.

Governor Jerry Brown signed the new measure – which necessitates at least one female director on the board of each California-based public operation by the end of 2019 – into law on Sunday.

Firms will need up to three female directors by the end of 2021, depending on the size of their boards.

Hundreds of companies will be affected by the law and those who violate it can be fined $100,000 (£76,600) for a first violation and $300,000 (£229,900) for a second.

A fourth of publicly held corporations with headquarters in California do not have any women on their boards of directors.

Democrat State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson – who authored the bill – said getting more women on boards will make firms more successful.

Ms Jackson argued women are more inclined to be collaborative and more adept at multitasking. She also thinks having more women in positions of power could have the impact of helping to decrease sexual assault and harassment in workplaces.

She said government intervention was needed because firms have failed to make enough effort to increase the number of women on their boards in spite of encouragement from the legislature.

“This is one of the last bastions of total male domination. We know that the public and business are not being well-served by this level of discrimination,” she said.

Research demonstrates female representation on boards is crucial for women to advance in corporate America. Women on boards are more likely to consider female leaders for the most senior roles in a company and also select more diverse applicants for the actual board.

Opponents to establishing quotas for representation argue the pressure results in unqualified female members and poses the possibility of discrimination against male applicants.

The California Chamber of Commerce argued the makeup of corporate boards should be decided on through internal processes rather than being directed by government. The chamber also argued the new measure will rank gender above other elements of diversity such as race and ethnicity.

Some European countries, including Norway and France, already mandate that corporate boards include women. The laws in Norway require a certain percentage of women on boards, and for larger Norwegian companies, the legislation requires women constitute as much as 40 per cent of the board.

The law which Governor Brown has just signed applies to firms which declare their principal executive offices as being located in California.

“I don’t minimise the potential flaws that indeed may prove fatal to its ultimate implementation,” Governor Brown wrote in a signing statement.

“Nevertheless, recent events in Washington, DC – and beyond – make it crystal clear that many are not getting the message.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in