California bans schools starting before 8.30am so youngsters can have more sleep
Teens told to enjoy a lie in as legislators outlaw mandatory early starts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is a new law that would surely be a vote-winner, if only teenagers could vote.
Schools in California are to be banned from opening before 8.30am – so youngsters can enjoy a lie-in.
State legislators narrowly approved the proposals for all high and middle schools, saying evidence suggested that children who had longer in bed were healthier and more likely to graduate.
Supporters said research showed teenagers especially benefited from sleeping later: lower depression and anxiety rates, higher attainment and fewer car accidents have all been associated with school start times being pushed back in the US.
"This is the single most cost-effective thing we can do to improve high school graduation rates," said assemblyman Jay Obernolte.
Headteachers will have three years to introduce the new starting time once state governor Jerry Brown rubber stamps the bill.
At present, some 80 per cent of schools will need to change to comply, reports Fox News. Many may continue to offer earlier start times but as voluntary ‘extra’ periods, it has been suggested.
Opponents reckon local school boards, not the state, should determine start times
One, assemblyman Jose Medina, said: “When it comes to education, the farther away the decisions are made from the classroom, the worse those decisions are."
Another, Patrick O’Donnell argued: “We should not micromanage schools from Sacramento [the state capital]. Why have a school district if we are going to pass this bill? It will burden working families.”
The rule – which was previously turned down in 2017 – will not apply to rural schools.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments