Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Conservative California school board adopts curriculum including gay rights after spat with governor

Temecula Valley Unified School District, a conservative board in a liberal state, reversed its curriculum decision on Friday

Sheila Flynn
Saturday 22 July 2023 13:34 EDT
Comments
School board president calls 'BS' on anti-LGBT book ban protest

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A conservative California school board staunchly opposed to teaching gay rights in its social studies curriculum finally reversed course after holding a heated nine-hour debate and publicly feuding with Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.

On Friday, Temecula Valley Unified School District voted to adopt “California’s Cultural Contributions” textbooks, reversing a May vote rejecting the curriculum. A hearing was held in June during which many parents disagreed with the board’s 3-2 decision, followed by a nine-hour meeting earlier this month.

Governor Newsom had threatened to not only send the textbooks to Temecula but fine the district $1.5million if it did not implement curriculum which had been approved by the State Board of Education for Grades 1-5.

“We’re going to purchase the book for these students – the same one that hundreds of thousands of kids are already using,” the governor tweeted on 13 July. “If these extremist school board members won’t do their job, we will – and fine them for their incompetence.”

“Fortunately, now students will receive the basic materials needed to learn,” he said in a statement following the Temecula district’s decision.

“But this vote lays bare the true motives of those who opposed this curriculum. This has never been about parents’ rights. It’s not even about Harvey Milk – who appears nowhere in the textbook students receive. This is about extremists’ desire to control information and censor the materials used to teach our children.”

Much of the district’s controversy had centred on Mr Milk, the first known out gay man to hold public office in California who was assassinated at San Francisco City Hall in 1978.

Allison Barclay, a board member of the Temecula Valley Unified School District, told CNN that there was “no mention of Harvey Milk in the textbook that I know of”.

“He is listed in a supplemental section titled ‘Biographies’ where there are several hundred short, age-appropriate biographies of historical figures,” she said.

Within the curriculum lessons, she said, “there are several sections, such as artists, architects, writers, educators, discussing Californians who made substantial contributions in these areas. Under the heading ‘Protests,’ one paragraph discusses gay rights in California and under the heading ‘Court Cases,’ there are two paragraphs that discuss the court cases that allowed gay marriage in California.”

Gov Newsom –a vocal opponent of book bans and other Republican efforts across the country, not just California – continued in his Friday statement: “Demagogues who whitewash history, censor books, and perpetuate prejudice never succeed. Hate doesn’t belong in our classrooms and because of the board majority’s antics, Temecula has a civil rights investigation to answer for.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in