Bush agrees nuclear dump site in desert
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President George Bush ploughed into fresh controversy on the environment yesterday by giving his approval to a plan to store 77,000 tons of nuclear waste under a mountain in the Nevada desert – a plan denounced by many scientists, former government officials and Nevada politicians as a serious security and contamination risk.
He rubber-stamped a recommendation by his Energy Secretary, Spencer Abraham, who concluded last month that the site at Yucca Mountain, about 90 miles north-west of Las Vegas, was "scientifically sound and suitable".
The government has spent 20 years looking for a suitable repository for the nation's nuclear energy industry, and a decision is already long overdue.
Supporters of the President's decision say he had no choice given the mounting of volume of radioactive waste currently being stored at a number of makeshift sites around the country. Yucca Mountain is the only place remote enough, and surrounded by enough federally-owned land to be secure enough, they argue.
Opponents of the scheme argue transporting waste to Yucca Mountain is dangerous in itself. They also fear contamination of groundwater or worse, because of the geology of the mountain and its position at the junction of seismic faults.
Earlier this month, the former head of the Department of Energy's taskforce on the issue, John Bartlett, said the government had known since 1995 that the Yucca Mountain site posed contamination risks to major water sources in the American West. Tom Daschle, the Democratic Senate Majority Leader, has raised concerns about a waste dump's attractiveness as a terrorist target.
In Nevada, Congressman Shelley Berkley denounced the decision as "corrupt and morally bankrupt". The mayor of Las Vegas, Oscar Goodman, called a news conference on Thursday and said of Mr Abraham: "I've called him a blockhead before, I've called him a fathead before. It's too good for him. That's it. Any questions?"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments