Bin Laden son-in-law trial may be delayed by cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The impact of $85bn (£55bn) of spending cuts, which began hitting the American economy at the beginning of March, was felt inside a New York courtroom this week, when it emerged that the trial of Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law could be delayed because of the fiscal impasse in Washington.
Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, a former preacher and husband of Bin Laden’s daughter Fatima, pleaded not guilty to a charge of conspiracy to kill Americans last month, just days after President Barack Obama – having failed to strike a deal with Congressional Republicans – signed a law authorising the spending cuts.
Mr Abu Ghaith is accused of being a spokesman for al-Qa’ida. Although he is not alleged to have had an operational role in the terror group’s plots, he has been portrayed as a key propagandist.
But now the proceedings against him are facing a delay after his court-appointed lawyers said it would be very hard for them to be ready for a proposed trial date of September. The reason? The five-and-a-half weeks of unpaid leave imposed on the lawyers as a result of the spending cuts. Known as “sequestration”, the cuts require public lawyers to take the time off by October.
According to Martin Cohen, one of the accused’s lawyers, a September trial would thus present a problem for the Federal Defenders of New York, the non-profit organisation representing Mr Abu Ghaith. It receives federal funding and has to implement the leave of absence.
At a hearing on Monday, Mr Cohen suggested a January trial date instead. US district judge Lewis Kaplan, who is presiding over the case, said it was “stunning” that spending cuts could cause a delay in a trial of such importance.
Mr Abu Ghaith was arrested in Turkey in late February before being transferred to the US.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments