Barack Obama: Hillary Clinton's Wall Street speeches cast her as an 'insider' and helped her lose to Donald Trump
Ms Clinton is said to have earned $22 million in ‘speaking fees’ over two years
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Barack Obama has said Hillary Clinton may have lost the election because she was seen by voters as an establishment “insider”.
Transcripts of paid private speeches made by the Democratic presidential candidate to financial executives from Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley and others were published in October by Wikileaks.
It was reported at the time that Ms Clinton was paid $225,000 (£181,500) for one speech in 2013 and earned around $22 million (£17.7 million) in ‘speaking fees’ over two years.
“Hillary may have been more vulnerable because she was viewed as an insider,” the outgoing President told The New Yorker.
He said reporting around the Wall Street speeches “might have reduced her advantage, the normal Democratic advantage, in the eyes of working people, that we were standing for them.
“I don’t think it was fair, but that’s how it played itself out.”
One of Mr Trump’s campaign videos released days before the election showed images of Lloyd Goldman, CEO of Goldman Sachs, alongside archive footage of the Clinton Global Initiative and shots of Wall Street.
These were contrasted with videos of seemingly everyday Americans in the workplace.
Over the images, a voiceover spoken by Mr Trump blamed a "global power structure" for economic problems faced by American citizens.
“It’s a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities," he said.
“The only thing that can stop this corrupt machine is you.”
Bernie Sanders said Ms Clinton had lost because the party was more concerned with “raising money from wealthy individuals” than campaigning on behalf of ordinary people.
He told Radio 4’s Today programme the Democrats should have concentrated on "bringing working people into the party and taking on the billionaire class, taking on Wall Street, the drug companies or the insurance companies.”
“The Democratic Party has not been strong in standing up for working families,” he said.
Mr Obama also told The New Yorker that social media and the proliferation of digital news sites “means everything is true and nothing is true.”
“An explanation of climate change from a Nobel Prize-winning physicist looks exactly the same on your Facebook page as the denial of climate change by somebody on the Koch brothers’ payroll,” he said.
According to the article, written by the magazine's editor, Mr Obama had talked “obsessively” with his senior advisor, David Simas, about reports of a “digital gold rush” that was seeing pro-Trump websites cropping up at an alarming rate and gaining hundreds of thousands of Facebook followers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments