Austin newspaper stops sponsored content after outrage over ad for Asian mail-order bride
The Austin Chronicle said the ad did “not reflect” its values
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Austin Chronicle, a weekly paper in Texas, will no longer run sponsored content after it faced backlash for publishing an ad for Asian mail-order brides.
The ad was posted to the Chronicle's website on 24 June under a sponsored content tag. It included links to several websites that claimed to connect its customers to tens of thousands of Asian women.
NBC News reports that the website also ranked five Asian countries for having the "best" brides. It reportedly used racist and misogynistic language in describing the women's looks and their gender roles.
The paper issued an apology after readers complained about the sponsored content piece.
“We appreciate your comments and for calling us out for advertisements that we believe do not reflect Chronicle values or our mission as a progressive newspaper,” the statement, which was not signed, said. “Going forward we will not host any mail-order bride sponsored ads, and we will be having vigorous internal conversations about past and future sponsored posts.”
Cassidy Frazier, the paper's associate publisher who manages its advertising department, announced on Thursday that the paper would no longer run sponsored content pieces. She said she wanted to be sure that any similar ads would "never see the light of day."
“They do not in any way reflect the Austin Chronicle as a company nor the people who work here,” she said in a statement. “We messed up, and we apologize.”
The company will hold sensitivity trainings in the wake of the incident. Ms Frazier also said that the moratorium on sponsored content will remain until "more strenuous policies are in place."
Social media companies and Google have eaten up advertising dollars that journalism outlets have traditionally relied upon for revenue. In an attempt to make up for that loss, outlets over the past decade have run "sponsored content," which are essentially advertisements that look like a traditional news story.
The practice has long been met with ethics concerns, as many journalists often worry that running ads that look like articles will confuse readers and hurt their credibility. Most publishers, including The Independent, run sponsored content under specific tags and markers to ensure readers understand that what they are about to read is an advertisement, and not a news story.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments