American 'Taliban' denied access to case against him
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Legal campaigners criticised a US federal court ruling yesterday that said the government did not have to reveal its evidence to an American citizen accused of fighting with the Taliban and al-Qa'ida.
The fourth circuit court said Yaser Hamdi, 22, from Louisiana did not have the right to see the prosecution's case in advance. In its ruling, the three-judge panel said: "The safeguards that all Americans have come to expect in criminal prosecutions do not translate neatly to the arena of armed conflict." Mr Hamdi was seized in Afghanistan in November 2001.
The Bush administration welcomed the ruling. It has contended that it can deny enemy combatants who are US citizens access to a lawyer or to see the evidence against them. But Susan Herman, a professor at Brooklyn Law School, said: "This decision condones the government's creation of a constitutional no-man's land."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments