Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Actor Jason Patric sues for rights of sperm donors as parents

The Hollywood star conceived a child with his ex-girlfriend Danielle Schrieber through IVF

Tim Walker
Thursday 15 August 2013 13:48 EDT
Comments
Jason Patric's son was conceived by IVF after his relationship had ended
Jason Patric's son was conceived by IVF after his relationship had ended (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jason Patric is fighting for a coveted new role – as father of the son he provided sperm to conceive.

This week, the 48-year-old star of Lost Boys and Speed 2: Cruise Control appeared before California lawmakers to argue for new legislation that would allow sperm donors to take a larger role in their children’s lives. Mr Patric conceived a child with his ex-girlfriend Danielle Schrieber through IVF. Though the couple were separated, Patric claims he participated out of affection for Ms Schrieber, and that he shares an emotional bond with their son, Gus, who is now three years old.

Several months ago, Ms Schrieber severed contact between Mr Patric and Gus, leading to a bitter custody dispute. Mr Patric was not listed on his son’s birth certificate, and Ms Schrieber testified that he had little or no role in the boy’s upbringing.

In February a judge deemed the actor a sperm donor, not a parent, and denied him visitation rights. Mr Patric is appealing the ruling.

Following his case, California state senator Jerry Hill introduced a bill to allow men whose sperm is used to conceive a child via artificial insemination to sue for parental rights, provided they can demonstrate involvement in the child’s life.

This week, the star recounted his experience to the state’s Assembly Judiciary Committee, testifying that he had been in a long-term relationship with Ms Schreiber, and that they had tried to conceive by IVF and more traditional methods, but without success. “It destroyed the relationship but not the love,” the actor said. Following their split, he agreed to another round of IVF, which resulted in Gus’s birth.

Mr Patric claimed Ms Schreiber has forbidden him access to his son for the past 25 weeks, and that he was speaking on behalf of other men in the same situation.

“We raised these children, we loved these children, but when these relationships fell apart we were shockingly hit with briefs that deemed us ‘sperm donors’: a word that was never, ever mentioned in my house, a word I can guarantee you Gus doesn’t know how to pronounce,” he said.

Mr Hill’s bill, SB 115, was passed by the California Senate, but now requires the approval of the state’s assembly. Its opponents, including women’s rights groups such as the National Organization for Women and Planned Parenthood, say the proposed law could inadvertently threaten the rights of single mothers and same-sex couples who use sperm donors.

Ms Schrieber, for her part, is adamant that Mr Patric surrendered any parental rights before she conceived, and said he agreed to be an anonymous donor. “Jason never did anything to raise Gus. He never changed a single diaper,” she recently told Today on NBC.

Following Mr Patric’s testimony, the Judiciary panel voted 5-2 to keep SB115 in committee for further discussion. Mr Hill has asked to submit a modified version of the bill for consideration. Mr Patric was frustrated by the decision, telling the Associated Press that the committee “doesn’t care about children in the middle of something and fixing it”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in