Abu Ghraib abuse ringleader found guilty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The army reservist found guilty of abusing prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq said at his sentencing hearing yesterday that he was merely following orders. The soldier, Specialist Charles Graner, received a 10-year sentence after being convicted on 10 counts of prisoner abuse at the end of a four-day trial in Texas.
The army reservist found guilty of abusing prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq said at his sentencing hearing yesterday that he was merely following orders. The soldier, Specialist Charles Graner, received a 10-year sentence after being convicted on 10 counts of prisoner abuse at the end of a four-day trial in Texas.
Prosecutors described him as the ringleader of the scandal that shocked public opinion worldwide a year ago.
As the court moved into the sentencing phase yesterday, Graner took the stand for the first time and insisted that he had been corrupted by his superiors who were running the prison, military and civilian intelligence officers who wanted the inmates "softened up" before being interrogated.
Graner, 36, said that he had originally resisted the orders and had repeatedly complained to his superiors about the harsh treatment he was being forced to mete out. But the prosecutor convinced the jurors, who took only five hours to reach their verdict, that the soldier had grossly overstepped the rules.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments