Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

South African poll observers criticise 'legitimate' finding

John Battersby
Thursday 14 March 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Some members of South Africa's observer mission in Zimbabwe broke ranks yes-terday to criticise the dele-gation's decision that the re-election of Robert Mugabe was "legitimate".

Bobby Godsell, who was a member of the 50-strong South African team, said: "I am both confused and uncomfortable about the use of the word 'legitimate' to describe the Zimbabwean poll."

Another observer, who preferred not to be identified, said he and two other South African observers had been taken aback by the "hardline police harassment of government opponents" in the election, both in urban and rural areas.

When the observer mission leader, Sam Motsuenyane, a South African businessman, announced their findings in Harare on Wednesday he was reportedly jeered by journalists and diplomats.

South Africa's Deputy President, Jacob Zuma, who held talks in Harare with President Mugabe yesterday, said the government in Zimbabwe was "happy" with the observers' report that concluded the election "should be considered legitimate" but not "free and fair." But Mr Godsell said that he was confused by the conflicting terminology used.

He said: "I don't understand the difference between legitimate and free and fair. I don't understand how an election can not be free and fair but can also be legitimate."

Mr Godsell was an observer in Harare where there had been some "distinct problems".

"I understand that the mission is to release a final report and I am assuming that there will be an opportunity to debate and discuss the findings that have been made," he said.

"So I am hoping that there will be a chance to clarify the irregularities but I concede that the damage has been done already by now."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in