Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Women can rise above unfair pay

Barrie Clement
Tuesday 07 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Women at the top of companies and at the very bottom suffer less direct discrimination over pay than their female colleagues in middle management, a study has found, writes Barrie Clement.

As soon as women break through the "glass ceiling" they tend to be judged on their merits to a greater extent, according to Tuvia Melamed of Anglia Polytechnic University.

In a study of 1,200 men and women in a wide range of jobs and industries, Dr Melamed discovered that men earned on average pounds 20,700 and women pounds 14,700. He found that overall 20 per cent of the difference in pay was attributable to simple prejudice. For middle managers, however, the proportion rose to 40 per cent. Among junior employees, only 2 per cent was the result of direct discrimination. For women who had broken through the "glass ceiling" and become senior managers and top executives, between 11 per cent and 15 per cent of the difference was caused by prejudice. "If you manage to progress through to this level you are judged more on your abilities," Dr Melamed said.

Women also, however, suffered from indirect discrimination where employers sought personal qualities which were normally associated to a greater extent with men.

Addressing the conference, Dr Melamed said that from the late 1970s the relative wages of men and women in full-time jobs were on a "slowly convergent path". This process seemed to have been set in motion by the Equal Pay Act which came into force in 1976, but the move to equality was not yet finished.

Recent figures suggested that women's salaries were about 72 per cent of men's. While in 1970 women earned only 62 per cent of men's wages, today there was still a 28 per cent differential.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in