Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Women 'bombarded' with fertility drugs

Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 04 March 1998 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Infertile women seeking test-tube baby treatment are being bombarded with drugs to stimulate ovulation, increasing the cost and deterring patients, a leading fertility expert said yesterday.

Professor Robert Edwards, who started the fertility revolution 20 years ago with the birth of Louise Brown, the world's first test-tube baby, said women were being dosed with too many hormones in each treatment cycle.

"We are seeing ever more drastic ovarian stimulation when we should be striving for simpler forms of treatment. Currently technologies are too expensive, which means in vitro fertilisation is not available to sufficient couples. It should be made available at much cheaper prices."

Professor Edwards, of the University of Cambridge, said women were routinely given 10 to 20 injections of different drugs to stimulate ovulation and up to 50 eggs were being retrieved. "What do we do with 50 eggs? I want four or five excellent eggs and embryos. This has got to go."

"We are doing things I think we should not be doing. In Oldham we used very low levels of hormones to stimulate patients. Since IVF spread worldwide it's turned into a pharmaceutical nonsense. We can't go on treating patients like this."

Speaking to a conference in London on IVF, Professor Edwardssaid cutting costs was key to making the treatment more widely available. Over the last 20 years, 300,000 IVF babies have been born worldwide, but there were thousands more couples who could benefit but were denied treatment because of the cost.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in