Woman guilty of paternity conspiracy against Cosby
People
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The paragon of black American fatherhood, the millionaire comedian, Bill Cosby, yesterday won his case against a young woman who threatened to expose him to the media as her natural father. Autumn Jackson, 22, was found guilty of extortion and other offences by a New York court yesterday in a high- profile case that has split American opinion.
Ms Jackson and two associates had been accused of demanding $40m (pounds 25m) from Mr Cosby against threats to expose him to the media as her natural father. She was convicted of extortion, conspiracy and crossing a state border in order to commit a crime. Her two associates were also convicted.
On hearing the verdict, after a three-week trial during which Mr Cosby had appeared in person, Ms Jackson broke down in tears, sobbing to her lawyer: "How could they?"
On the face of it, the case against Ms Jackson, which was backed up with recordings of telephone threats and demands made to Mr Cosby's lawyers, was open and shut. She had demanded money from Mr Cosby with menaces. In practice, however, it was far more complicated. As her lawyer argued, she had grounds for believing that she was indeed Mr Cosby's daughter. Mr Cosby admitted to having a fling with her mother around the time she was conceived and had paid towards her upkeep. Ms Jackson alleged that this was "hush-money", intended to silence her mother.
Mr Cosby, who says these contributions were gifts similar to those he has made to a number of young black people, denies paternity, but has consistently refused to take a blood test. The judge ruled that whether or not he was her father was irrelevant to the extortion charge against her. It is this that has split America.
Some believe that the fact or not of Mr Cosby's paternity is crucial to the case. Others believe that extortion is extortion, whether or not the threatened expose is true. While Mr Cosby has won the case on that principle, the question of his paternity could be reconsidered during the sentencing hearing which is likely to be held next week. At stake is his image as television's ideal father - an image, in an America hungry for black family role models, that has made him very rich.
Earlier this year, Mr Cosby's son, Ennis, was murdered, after breaking down on a road in California. In a misjudgement, Ms Jackson made her first threat the day after the killing, at a time when sympathies were all with the star.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments