Willetts could be forced to quit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Treasury minister David Willetts is expected to be strongly censured today following a Commons inquiry into an alleged conspiracy to subvert an investigation into the Neil Hamilton cash for questions affair.
Depending on the strength of the reprimand by the newly created Standards and Privileges Committee, Mr Willetts could be forced to resign his Government post.
The all-party committee has been deadlocked for some weeks after nearly 20 hours of debate over the terms of its verdict on Mr Willetts, who, as a Government whip, is alleged to have attempted to block a Commons investigation into the cash for questions scandal.
It had been claimed that Mr Hamilton, the former Conservative minister, had accepted cash payments from Mohamed al-Fayed, the owner of Harrods.
While that claim was being examined by the now-defunct Committee of Members' Interests, Mr Willetts spoke with Sir Geoffrey Johnson Smith, the Conservative chairman, and subsequently wrote a whips' office memo which suggested pressure was being exerted on the inquiry.
He said that Sir Geoffrey's committee should either argue that the matter was sub judice, and set it aside, or that it should be investigated speedily, "exploiting good Tory majority at present". Either course of action, as recommended by Mr Willetts would have been grossly improper as the investigation was a quasi-judicial process.
The investigation into Mr Willetts was the first test of the application of a stricter code of conduct demanded by Lord Nolan's Committee on Standards in Public Life.
Continued deadlock in the standards and privileges committee, with the ultimate publication of majority and minority reports, would have shown that the Commons was unable to police itself in such cases. That would have led to strong demands for external investigation into allegations of misconduct and Commons sleaze which MPs have resisted.
Today's report, said last night to be unanimous, will be presented to the Commons, and published, at 3.30pm today. It will then have to be considered by the whole House.
In the past, recommendations of disciplinary committees have not always been upheld by the whole House, but if Mr Willetts is reprimanded no further action will be required, and it is possible that while he might feel the need to resign, the issue can then be considered resolved.
However, the substantive outstanding issue, the fate of Mr Hamilton, remains. That is under investigation by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Sir Gordon Downey.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments