Widow wins final battle for frozen sperm
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Diane Blood (right), the widow who battled for two years to have her dead husband's baby, was yesterday granted final permission to be artificially inseminated in a Belgian clinic.
She celebrated with champagne, and immediately rang her parents-in-law, after the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority unanimously decided to allow her to export her late husband's sperm for treatment.
Ruth Deech, chairman of the authority, which is thought to have spent pounds 100,000 fighting the case, said it had finally agreed to the export after a High Court ruling in Mrs Blood's favour. It had written to her solicitors and to the clinic where the sperm is stored.
"This is the only way to resolve the tragic situation for Mrs Blood, one which will not arise again." said Mrs Deech. "We've been concerned throughout to uphold the integrity of the principle of consent and we are pleased that the Court of Appeal has confirmed this."
Asked if she felt the HFEA should apologise to the widow, Mrs Deech said: "I don't think an apology is called for because all the way our view of UK law has been upheld by the courts."
She added that if the Court of Appeal had not been sufficiently explicit, the body would have refused her wishes once again.
"This is obviously wonderful, wonderful news. I am very, very relieved." said Mrs Blood. "I am slightly bewildered still and I don't yet fully believe it."
"It has just been a long time and so many emotions, I don't think I can sum it up. There have been so many different emotions."
She said she had not yet made any firm arrangements for her treatment, adding: "I have felt unable to make any arrangements so far. I am glad now to be able to speak to people sensibly and make arrangements."
Glenda Cooper and
David Garfinkel
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments