Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Why middle-class women get ahead in their careers

Barrie Clement
Monday 12 January 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Middle-class working mothers are forging ahead with their careers, while their unskilled sisters are staying firmly at the bottom of the heap. Barrie Clement, Labour Editor, finds that lone mothers - the target of benefit cuts - have the worst time of all.

There is a "growing gulf" between working mothers with top jobs and those lower down the scale who struggle to balance work and children.

Britain's highly educated and high wage mothers are far more likely to remain in employment during their child-rearing years with employers increasingly prepared to help them to do so.

Companies want to keep their high-flyers, those that contribute most to the business and those who are the most costly to train and replace. "Employers seem more inclined to introduce family-friendly policies for their higher status female employees such as managers," said Professor Heather Joshi, of the City University, London.

Such women have more family-friendly working arrangements, better fringe benefits and are more highly motivated to stay in employment.

Clearly, these mothers are also able to balance their babies and briefcases because they can afford a high standard of childcare, the professor says.

Any idea that employers might increasingly apply family-friendly benefits to other employees seems to have foundered on the recession.

The less well-paid and poorly qualified working class mothers have considerably greater difficulty in maintaining "career momentum" after the birth of their first child. Low wages and the cost of childcare is a major reason and the fact that employers are less likely to help them stay in employment.

Around two-thirds of women are still not benefiting much from equal opportunities and in many cases are failing to reach their potential, according Professor Joshi's report, "A Widening Gulf among Britain's Mothers".

The study, which is featured in the Economic and Social Research Council's new publication Business Connect: a brief guide to ESRC business research, also shows that women in full-time work find it much easier to keep their jobs after giving birth than part-timers.

Professor Joshi believes that the Government's policy of cutting benefits to lone parents is misguided. She argued that while state help should be restructured, it should offer incentives and help for people to get back to work, rather force them into employment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in