Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

What is it that makes a woman want to steal a baby? The abductor's profile

Jeremy Laurance
Friday 05 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The typical baby thief will go `window shopping' in local hospitals to look for the weakest security. Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor, looks at why women become so desperate that they snatch babies from hospitals.

Hospitals can deter abductors but they cannot keep them out altogether. John Rabun, of the US National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, who has visited Britain to advise hospital managers on security, said that although a determined abductor would evade any security cordon, the task was to make it as difficult as possible.

The typical abductor was a woman who might have miscarried and appeared pregnant. She was often not living with her partner and had planned the baby "to get him back''. When she miscarried she went in search of another baby.

British experts stressed that the cases were extremely rare. Anthony Black, former head of the psychology unit at Broadmoor hospital, said the abductors, who were always women, tended to be people who had been let down, usually by a man, or suffered a set-back such as a miscarriage or a failure to conceive.

"The cases tend to figure around the break-up of a relationship or a loss of some kind. The woman may even be deluded that she has a baby. She may go through a phantom pregnancy. Some women pad themselves out to please a partner."

He said the abductors tended to be sensitive, vulnerable people who had had unhappy experiences which involved being let down or deserted.

"Ordinary people will cope with a lot of distress. They grin and bear it or try for adoption or for infertility treatment, depending on their circumstances. These women invariably turn out to have had a chequered life history and the break-up or the miscarriage is the latest in a succession of onslaughts, insults and mishaps."

The upside was that because the babies were wanted they tended to be well looked after. "They treat them as their own. If a couple had snatched the baby one would worry that the motive was a bit more malign."

Alice Lovell, psychologist at South Bank University, London, and an expert on the effects of miscarriage, said that the idea that women who lost a baby might think of taking someone else's was a myth. "These women want their own baby. There is no evidence that miscarriage leads to abduction. To compound the loss these women suffer by assuming they might resort to abduction is very hurtful."

In the US, 170 infants have been abducted since 1983, nine so far this year. Ten are still missing. Cathy Nahirny, of the US Center for Missing and Exploited Children said yesterday: "The recovery rate is very good. The babies are very rarely harmed. The women who take them raise them as their own."

She said when a new born baby was taken it was possible the woman would have faked a pregnancy keeping her partner, family and friends in the dark.

She said although there was no criminal intent they lived their lives by lying and deceit. "They are incredibly convincing con-artists."

In one case in the US, a woman whose marriage to a soldier was going through a rocky patch told him she was pregnant. She then convinced him that there was a tradition in her family going back generations that the pregnant couple did not have sex or sleep together during the pregnancy. Her husband, anxious not to upset her, accepted the story.

During her "pregnancy" she stuffed padding in her clothes and when she was "due" and her husband was away for a few days, she applied for a babysitting position - and stole the baby.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in