Welfare costs 'do not slow economy'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Claims that big social security budgets lead to slow economic growth are debatable, according to a new study published this week by the London School of Economics.
"In no field of public spending is the pressure for reductions greater than that of the welfare state," Tony Atkinson, warden of Nuffield College, Oxford, says in an LSE booklet, The Welfare State and Economic Performance. "It is argued that the size of social transfers [social security and welfare payments] is responsible for a decline in economic performance, and that cuts in spending are a prerequisite for a return to a golden age of full employment and economic growth."
The evidence for that is mixed, he says, after a review of nine European studies of the issue, and provides "no overwhelming evidence that high spending leads to lower growth rates".
Indeed, he argues, studies which simply look at the amounts spent may not be capable of answering the question of whether high spending leads to poorer economic performance. The way the money is spent may be as important as how much.
For example, unemployment and other insurance-based benefits allow partners to carry on working. Under means-tested assistance, however, a partner's earnings are taken into account in deciding benefit. That can produce incentives to give up work and claim, rather than work for marginal financial advantage. "The form of benefits, and the conditions under which they may be claimed, can change their impact."
Equally, providing incentives for people to switch to personal pensions in place of state provision can affect capital markets, changing the nature of investment decisions. Until such issues are taken into account, studies aimed at proving whether or not high welfare spending harms growth are unlikely to be conclusive, Professor Atkinson says.
tThe Welfare State and Economic Performance; WSP/109; LSE Welfare State programme.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments