Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Watchdog attacks rail firms for misleading public

Randeep Ramesh
Friday 21 February 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The railway passenger watchdog has attacked train companies over "blatant fiddling on punctuality" .

In a talk to rail professionals, David Bertram, the chairman of the Central Rail Users' Consultative Committee, said that companies were inserting an extra 10 minutes before the final stop in a train's journey in order to avoid compensating customers for late arrivals.

He told the conference on `The New Railway': "To measure the punctuality of a train from Edinburgh by its arrival time in Penzance, when it may have been late en route and missed lots of connections, is wrong." A spokesman for the committee also pointed out that it was difficult to see why the journey from Peterborough to the capital took up to 10 minutes longer than services running in the other direction.

Payments to travellers are made by train companies under the Passenger Charter, which was introduced in 1992.

Companies denied they were deliberately misleading passengers. A spokesman for the Association of Train Operating Companies, which represents all 25 passenger services, said: "It is necessary to have some sort of contingency plans for rail journeys especially into London, which is frequently congested." Randeep Ramesh

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in